Rename and unguard CMD_DOWNLOAD_RAW_ADC_SAMPLES_125K ans it's used more generally than LF
This commit is contained in:
@@ -295,7 +295,7 @@ static void PacketResponseReceived(PacketResponseNG *packet) {
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
// iceman: hw status - down the path on device, runs printusbspeed which starts sending a lot of
|
||||
// CMD_DOWNLOAD_RAW_ADC_SAMPLES_125K packages which is not dealt with. I wonder if simply ignoring them will
|
||||
// CMD_DOWNLOAD_BIGBUF packages which is not dealt with. I wonder if simply ignoring them will
|
||||
// work. lets try it.
|
||||
default: {
|
||||
storeReply(packet);
|
||||
@@ -755,8 +755,8 @@ bool GetFromDevice(DeviceMemType_t memtype, uint8_t *dest, uint32_t bytes, uint3
|
||||
|
||||
switch (memtype) {
|
||||
case BIG_BUF: {
|
||||
SendCommandOLD(CMD_DOWNLOAD_RAW_ADC_SAMPLES_125K, start_index, bytes, 0, NULL, 0);
|
||||
return dl_it(dest, bytes, start_index, response, ms_timeout, show_warning, CMD_DOWNLOADED_RAW_ADC_SAMPLES_125K);
|
||||
SendCommandOLD(CMD_DOWNLOAD_BIGBUF, start_index, bytes, 0, NULL, 0);
|
||||
return dl_it(dest, bytes, start_index, response, ms_timeout, show_warning, CMD_DOWNLOADED_BIGBUF);
|
||||
}
|
||||
case BIG_BUF_EML: {
|
||||
SendCommandOLD(CMD_DOWNLOAD_EML_BIGBUF, start_index, bytes, 0, NULL, 0);
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user