- Replace NOP3 with CHECKSEQUENCEVERIFY (BIP112)
<nSequence> CHECKSEQUENCEVERIFY -> <nSequence>
- Fails if txin.nSequence < nSequence, allowing funds of a txout to be locked for a number of blocks or a duration of time after its inclusion in a block.
- Pull most of CheckLockTime() out into VerifyLockTime(), a local function that will be reused for CheckSequence()
- Add bitwise AND operator to CScriptNum
- Enable CHECKSEQUENCEVERIFY as a standard script verify flag
- Transactions that fail CSV verification will be rejected from the mempool, making it easy to test the feature. However blocks containing "invalid" CSV-using transactions will still be accepted; this is *not* the soft-fork required to actually enable CSV for production use.
"do not meet pay the minimum relay fee" ? I can understand English language quite well, but that I do not understand. So, if it's not an semantic nonsense, I would suggest to write it in more simple English.
Check the returned script_error. Add expected script_error
for generated as well as custom tests.
The specific error is not part of consensus, however
it could avoid unclear reporting issues such as #6862 in the future.
Fixes#7513.
b460004 release-notes: Minor corrections and clarifications re Priority (Luke Dashjr)
3450f4c release-notes: Significantly rewrite priority transactions section (Gregory Maxwell)
d0dbb6d release-notes: Remove suggestion to use 0.11 (Luke Dashjr)
73a0375 release-notes: Mention possibility of priority removal in 0.13, uncertainty of priority calculation being changed back, and request community input (Luke Dashjr)
4b8d2bc release-notes: Cover priority changes correctly, removing mentions of possible futures (Luke Dashjr)
SequenceLocks functions are used to evaluate sequence lock times or heights per BIP 68.
The majority of this code is copied from maaku in #6312
Further credit: btcdrak, sipa, NicolasDorier
If number of conflict confirms cannot be determined, this means
that the block is still unknown or not yet part of the main chain,
for example during a reindex. Do nothing in that case,
instead of crash with an assertion.
Fixes#7234.
Github-Pull: #7491
Rebased-From: 40e7b61835
If number of conflict confirms cannot be determined, this means
that the block is still unknown or not yet part of the main chain,
for example during a reindex. Do nothing in that case,
instead of crash with an assertion.
Fixes#7234.
This test is no longer relevant.
It was introduced in 8c222dca4f to check
the switch to 1MB blocks after the BDB too-many-locks issue back in
2013. The switching code has been long since removed.
It also needs a specific data file that is hard to find. I've verified
in #6320 that it still passes, however I think there is zero reason to
keep it.
Closes#6320.
