Fix coin selection to only include change when it's necessary.
This commit is contained in:
@@ -6,9 +6,6 @@
|
||||
// how many times to run all the tests to have a chance to catch errors that only show up with particular random shuffles
|
||||
#define RUN_TESTS 100
|
||||
|
||||
// enables tests which currently fail, due to code which tries too hard to avoid sub-cent change
|
||||
// #define STRICT
|
||||
|
||||
// some tests fail 1% of the time due to bad luck.
|
||||
// we repeat those tests this many times and only complain if all iterations of the test fail
|
||||
#define RANDOM_REPEATS 5
|
||||
@@ -109,15 +106,10 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(coin_selection_tests)
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK_GT(nValueRet, 34 * CENT); // but should get more than 34 cents
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(setCoinsRet.size(), 3); // the best should be 20+10+5. it's incredibly unlikely the 1 or 2 got included (but possible)
|
||||
|
||||
// when we try making 7 cents, the smaller coins (1,2,5) are enough. I'd hope to see just 2+5, but 1 gets included too
|
||||
// when we try making 7 cents, the smaller coins (1,2,5) are enough. We should see just 2+5
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK( wallet.SelectCoinsMinConf( 7 * CENT, 1, 1, vCoins, setCoinsRet, nValueRet));
|
||||
#ifdef STRICT
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(nValueRet, 7 * CENT);
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(setCoinsRet.size(), 2);
|
||||
#else
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK(nValueRet == 7 * CENT || nValueRet == 8 * CENT);
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK(setCoinsRet.size() == 2 || setCoinsRet.size() == 3);
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
|
||||
// when we try making 8 cents, the smaller coins (1,2,5) are exactly enough.
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK( wallet.SelectCoinsMinConf( 8 * CENT, 1, 1, vCoins, setCoinsRet, nValueRet));
|
||||
@@ -161,13 +153,9 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(coin_selection_tests)
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(nValueRet, 18 * CENT); // we should get 18 in 1 coin
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(setCoinsRet.size(), 1); // because in the event of a tie, the biggest coin wins
|
||||
|
||||
// now try making 11 cents. we hope for 5+6 but get 5+7 due to fear of sub-cent change
|
||||
// now try making 11 cents. we should get 5+6
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK( wallet.SelectCoinsMinConf(11 * CENT, 1, 1, vCoins, setCoinsRet, nValueRet));
|
||||
#ifdef STRICT
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(nValueRet, 11 * CENT);
|
||||
#else
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK(nValueRet == 11 * CENT || nValueRet == 12 * CENT);
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(setCoinsRet.size(), 2);
|
||||
|
||||
// check that the smallest bigger coin is used
|
||||
@@ -201,24 +189,15 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(coin_selection_tests)
|
||||
|
||||
// try making 1 cent from 0.1 + 0.2 + 0.3 + 0.4 + 0.5 + 1111 = 1112.5 cents
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK( wallet.SelectCoinsMinConf(1 * CENT, 1, 1, vCoins, setCoinsRet, nValueRet));
|
||||
#ifdef STRICT
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(nValueRet, 1 * CENT); // we hope for the exact amount
|
||||
#else
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK(nValueRet == 1 * CENT || nValueRet == 1111 * CENT); // but get a single 1111 cent coin
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(nValueRet, 1 * CENT); // we should get the exact amount
|
||||
|
||||
// if we add more sub-cent coins:
|
||||
add_coin(0.6*CENT);
|
||||
add_coin(0.7*CENT);
|
||||
|
||||
// and try again to make 1.0 cents, the new coins will be used to make 2.0 cents - leaving 1.0 cent change
|
||||
// and try again to make 1.0 cents, we can still make 1.0 cents
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK( wallet.SelectCoinsMinConf(1 * CENT, 1, 1, vCoins, setCoinsRet, nValueRet));
|
||||
#ifdef STRICT
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(nValueRet, 1 * CENT); // we hope for the exact amount
|
||||
#else
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK(nValueRet == 1 * CENT || nValueRet == 2 * CENT); // but get a bunch of sub-cent coins totalling 2 cents
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK_GE(setCoinsRet.size(), 4); // 0.7 + 0.6 + 0.5 + 0.2 = 2.0 for example
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(nValueRet, 1 * CENT); // we should get the exact amount
|
||||
|
||||
// run the 'mtgox' test (see http://blockexplorer.com/tx/29a3efd3ef04f9153d47a990bd7b048a4b2d213daaa5fb8ed670fb85f13bdbcf)
|
||||
// they tried to consolidate 10 50k coins into one 500k coin, and ended up with 50k in change
|
||||
@@ -227,13 +206,8 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(coin_selection_tests)
|
||||
add_coin(50000 * COIN);
|
||||
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK( wallet.SelectCoinsMinConf(500000 * COIN, 1, 1, vCoins, setCoinsRet, nValueRet));
|
||||
#ifdef STRICT
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(nValueRet, 500000 * COIN); // we hope for the exact amount
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(nValueRet, 500000 * COIN); // we should get the exact amount
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(setCoinsRet.size(), 10); // in ten coins
|
||||
#else
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK(nValueRet == 500000 * COIN || nValueRet == 550000 * COIN); // but get 50k too much
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK(setCoinsRet.size() == 10 || setCoinsRet.size() == 11); // in 11 coins
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
|
||||
// if there's not enough in the smaller coins to make at least 1 cent change (0.5+0.6+0.7 < 1.0+1.0),
|
||||
// we need to try finding an exact subset anyway
|
||||
@@ -255,13 +229,8 @@ BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE(coin_selection_tests)
|
||||
add_coin(0.8 * CENT);
|
||||
add_coin(1111 * CENT);
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK( wallet.SelectCoinsMinConf(1 * CENT, 1, 1, vCoins, setCoinsRet, nValueRet));
|
||||
#ifdef STRICT
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(nValueRet, 1 * CENT); // we hope for the exact amount
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(nValueRet, 1 * CENT); // we should get the exact amount
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(setCoinsRet.size(), 2); // in two coins 0.4+0.6
|
||||
#else
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(nValueRet, 1111 * CENT); // but since value of smaller coins < target+cent, we get the bigger coin again
|
||||
BOOST_CHECK_EQUAL(setCoinsRet.size(), 1);
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
|
||||
// test avoiding sub-cent change
|
||||
empty_wallet();
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user