fix sdaftuar's nits again

it boggles the mind why these nits can't be delivered on a more timely basis
This commit is contained in:
Alex Morcos
2016-02-11 15:34:04 -05:00
committed by BtcDrak
parent 0a79c04af3
commit 197c3760ff
3 changed files with 7 additions and 7 deletions

View File

@@ -803,10 +803,10 @@ bool CheckSequenceLocks(const CTransaction &tx, int flags)
index.pprev = tip;
// CheckSequenceLocks() uses chainActive.Height()+1 to evaluate
// height based locks because when SequenceLocks() is called within
// CBlock::AcceptBlock(), the height of the block *being*
// evaluated is what is used. Thus if we want to know if a
// transaction can be part of the *next* block, we need to call
// SequenceLocks() with one more than chainActive.Height().
// ConnectBlock(), the height of the block *being*
// evaluated is what is used.
// Thus if we want to know if a transaction can be part of the
// *next* block, we need to use one more than chainActive.Height()
index.nHeight = tip->nHeight + 1;
// pcoinsTip contains the UTXO set for chainActive.Tip()
@@ -2221,7 +2221,7 @@ bool ConnectBlock(const CBlock& block, CValidationState& state, CBlockIndex* pin
}
if (!SequenceLocks(tx, nLockTimeFlags, &prevheights, *pindex)) {
return state.DoS(100, error("ConnectBlock(): contains a non-BIP68-final transaction", __func__),
return state.DoS(100, error("%s: contains a non-BIP68-final transaction", __func__),
REJECT_INVALID, "bad-txns-nonfinal");
}