fix sdaftuar's nits again
it boggles the mind why these nits can't be delivered on a more timely basis
This commit is contained in:
10
src/main.cpp
10
src/main.cpp
@@ -803,10 +803,10 @@ bool CheckSequenceLocks(const CTransaction &tx, int flags)
|
||||
index.pprev = tip;
|
||||
// CheckSequenceLocks() uses chainActive.Height()+1 to evaluate
|
||||
// height based locks because when SequenceLocks() is called within
|
||||
// CBlock::AcceptBlock(), the height of the block *being*
|
||||
// evaluated is what is used. Thus if we want to know if a
|
||||
// transaction can be part of the *next* block, we need to call
|
||||
// SequenceLocks() with one more than chainActive.Height().
|
||||
// ConnectBlock(), the height of the block *being*
|
||||
// evaluated is what is used.
|
||||
// Thus if we want to know if a transaction can be part of the
|
||||
// *next* block, we need to use one more than chainActive.Height()
|
||||
index.nHeight = tip->nHeight + 1;
|
||||
|
||||
// pcoinsTip contains the UTXO set for chainActive.Tip()
|
||||
@@ -2221,7 +2221,7 @@ bool ConnectBlock(const CBlock& block, CValidationState& state, CBlockIndex* pin
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (!SequenceLocks(tx, nLockTimeFlags, &prevheights, *pindex)) {
|
||||
return state.DoS(100, error("ConnectBlock(): contains a non-BIP68-final transaction", __func__),
|
||||
return state.DoS(100, error("%s: contains a non-BIP68-final transaction", __func__),
|
||||
REJECT_INVALID, "bad-txns-nonfinal");
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user